T.ĭO TESTQM3 with "Epson-10cpi", "MYFILE3.TXT". |Here is an in row 1 (Printed in 30-point Arial)ĭO TESTQM3 WITH "Epson-10cpi", "LPT1". F.ĭO TESTQM3 with "Epson-10cpi", "MYFILE2.TXT ADDITIVE". Will both output the following in character mode:ĭO TESTQM3 with "", "MYFILE2.TXT ADDITIVE". Will output the following in character mode:ĭO TESTQM3 with "Epson-10cpi", "MYFILE1.TXT". |Now printing a triple (Printed in raw character mode)ĭO TESTQM3 WITH "Epson-10cpi", "LPT1". Now let's look at some examples using the above program (without TESTQM3 WITH "", "LPT1". If you have no pdsetup active, then you can't print to a filename that starts with "PRN" or "LPT" or print directly to a parallel port. Just substitute all instances of "?" with prow() + 1, 0 say and all instances of ? with prow(), pcol() say.Ĭonclusions: Don't mix ?/? and when printing in character mode. What a mess, huh? Actually, this can be solved by printing solely using statements. The same program run in FPW 2.5 will output the following garbage:įPW Version 2.5a is different, but still not correct: The program will give the following (expected) output in FoxPro/DOS: ? "Now I'm on row 8,12 say "Row 8 Column 12" ? "Now I'm on row 6,10 say "Row 6 Column 10" ? "This is on row 3,3 say "Row 3 Column 3"
#EZ100PU 驅動 UPDATE#
It is interesting to note that even though this behaviour is exhibited, the ?/? command will still update the values of prow() and pcol() correctly. It seems that an attempt was made to fix this "pooling" phenomenon in version 2.5a, but it still does not act as it should, as you will see shortly. When you issue the set printer to to close the print job, the pool of ?/? output gets spit out, followed by the pool of output. When printing in character mode, there is some strange behaviour that goes on when you mix output using both ?/? and It seems that all of the output from the ?/? commands get collected into a pool of some sort and the output from the get collected in a separate pool.
The pdadvprt() may also be called by a ?/? command (and ? will cause pdlineend() and pdlinest() to execute also). The ?/? command will execute the _pddriver's pdobject() function with whatever style clause you may have stipulated being passed as a parameter to it. It should be noted that if a pdsetup is active, then the command does not execute any of the PD functions (which is also true in FoxPro/DOS). It is important to know that you will not see any output until you issue a set printer to command to close the print job. Set printer font (In other words, the output is graphically created as a rule) ELSE Print to destination in character mode ENDIF ENDIF
#EZ100PU 驅動 DRIVERS#
This can be overcome by using the to file clause instead or else defining all the appropriate Windows Printer Drivers you may need for output to different ports so you can select the one you want. The active pdsetup is ignored.Ĭonclusions: If you want to print a Report/Label definition that contains Windows objects, then you cannot designate the destination of your output through the set printer to command. Ignores the set printer to filename and instead prints to the default Windows Printer Driver. REPORT FORM windef TO FILE E:\TEST\MYFILE.TXT PDSETUP If any pdsetupis active when the command is issued, it is ignored in favor of the Windows Printer Driver.
If the pdsetupclause is included, it is ignored. Pdsetup that happens to be currently active and then FPW will print the output using the currently-active Windows Printer Driver.īehaviour: FPW prints to the destination using the currently-active Windows Printer Driver, printing the report and all its objects as designated in the Report definition (in other words, graphical output). You'll see that FoxPro for Windows (FPW) does not always exhibit this same behaviour. You can get the same result by issuing the commands set printer to e:\mydir\lpt1.dum and then list to printer. So the command list to file e:\mydir\lpt1.dum will list your database directly to your parallel port. No file would be created on your E Drive the output would go to the printer.įoxPro (like any other application that uses the standard BIOS routines) will do the same thing. The same is true if you were to re-write the statement as echo hello > e:\mydir\lpt1.dum. Therefore if you execute the DOS statementĮcho hello > lpt1, the word hello would appear on your printer it would not create a filename called LPT1. These device names are also reserved file names. PRN, LPT1, LPT2, LPT3 Parallel Ports (PRN is the same as LPT1)
#EZ100PU 驅動 SERIAL#
部份主題有附加檔案, 須先註冊成為社區居民才可以下載.ĭOS has the following reserved device names:ĪUX, COM1, COM2, COM3, COM4 Serial Ports (AUX is the same as COM1)